Monday, October 22, 2007

Crime Reporting Part II

Chapter 5 of this online text deals with how to cover crime in the context of its victims. The first thing to be deciphered is why the media covers crime to begin with. The author asks a series of questions in an attempt to frame editor's decisions: Was the crime unique? Was it especially tragice? Does someone know the victim? It is important to understand what is taken into account before a reporter can provide information. There are 5.7 million violent victimizations that take place in one year- a truly sobering figure. This means that a large percent of our population is sensitive because they have been victimized in the past.
I learned in this chapter that it is important to be sympathetic, but to keep the emotional expressions brief. I struggle with interacting with victims, perhaps because I grow so sympathetic that I get upset. This text suggests that it is best to simply state, "I'm sorry," in your initial encounter, and avoid in-depth emotional discussions. Always use caution on the scene, and be aware of the "wolfpack" journalism sense that the person may experience. Also, one of the most challenging aspects could be the recognition of post-traumatic stress disorder. If a reporter sees this, he or she should be respectful and sensitive to it, perhaps even get help for the person.
After the incident has occurred, the victim will be more prepared and comfortable to speak because they will have calmed down. It is important at this time for the reporter to have performed necessary background research, allowing them to permit the person to open up as fully as possible.
The question of graphic material is one that I have grappled with to a great extent. I would agree with the first question asked by this text, "Is graphic detail necessary to tell the story?" If a reporter answers, "no" to this question, omit the fact. End of story. Why make people distraught if they don't need to be?
Finally, almost 400,000 people, mostly women, suffer from sexual attacks or abuse. This is a subject that requires the upmost sensitivity and tact. While different media outlets have different views and opinions on printing their names/interviewing them, etc., I would strongly suggest that the individual reporter develops his or her own ethical code and to fight for it to be upheld at their place of work.

No comments: